Working full-time abroad means proving just that. In Paul Daniel v HMRC TC 03312, an investment banker failed to provide sufficient evidence to show that he was full-time working abroad and non-resident for CGT purposes.

The onus for proving that work is full-time work abroad is on the taxpayer.

Under the old residence rules in IR20, there was no definition of the average number of hours that have to be worked each week for work to be full-time. Rather, this varies depending on the nature of the employment, the work practice in the relevant country and industry practice.

As a result of the absence of concrete evidence, the FTT had to infer from other factors whether Mr Daniel was working full-time abroad. Unfortunately for him, it held that this was not credible and dismissed his appeal; and commented that he had failed to follow the tax advice provided by his tax advisers.

Comment

This case illustrates the absolute necessity for keeping written and timely records to support such a claim, and also for listening and following the advice of tax advisors. Following the introduction of the UK's new Statutory Residence test taxpayers are advised to maintain a day counting calender, see Statutory Residence Test Day Counting Toolkit

External links

Paul Daniel v HMRC [2014] TC 03312


Oak ad
Are you enjoying our content? 

Thousands of accountants and advisers and their clients use www.rossmartin.co.uk as their primary TAX resource.

Register with us now to receive our receive our FREE SME Topical Tax Update & newletter.