In William Tinkler v HMRC [2018] UKUT 0073 the Upper Tribunal (UT) decided that a copy of notice of an enquiry under section 9A TMA 1970 sent to a tax agent was validly served on a taxpayer.

The question was whether HMRC had validly opened an enquiry into a tax return? If so then the closure notice was invalid.

If not, then was the taxpayer estopped from denying that the enquiry had been validly opened by the conduct of his agent?

HMRC claimed that the notice was validly served.

The UT decided that a notice was validly served on the taxpayer via his agent. Form 64-8 allows tax agents to receive notices from HMRC and therefore HMRC can serve notices via an agent.

 On the estoppel point the UT disagreed with the earlier findings of FTT and found that estoppel cannot amend or disapply the provisions of section 9A by agreement.

Links

Grounds for Appeal

Closure Notices

Case

William Tinkler v HMRC [2018] UKUT 0073 (TCC)

William Henry Tinker [2016] FTT TC4960


 

 

Wouldn’t it be great and think how much TIME it would SAVE you if someone:

How about if that someone also:

Thousands of firms of accountants and advisers are already using www.rossmartin.co.uk as their primary TAX resource.

At a cost of just £1 per day, it’s a no brainer: FREE up your MIND and your TIME (and your wallet).

And...we run our Virtual Tax Partner support service, if you need assistance with a particular query or technical issue.