In Timothy Raggatt QC v HMRC UKUT 0412, the upper tribunal held that a barrister with fluctuating income does not need to provide a reserve to pay his or her income tax but must still make adequate provisions to pay income tax as it falls due.

The First Tier Tribunal (FTT) did not allow the appeal.

The taxpayer made a furhter appeal to the Upper Tribunal (UT) on the basis that the FTT had misunderstood the facts and misapplied the tests for reasonable excuse.

The UT agreed with the FTT: the excuses were not reasonable. Changes to legal aid fees were known about years in advance, the bank had made it clear that his overdraft would not be extended and there was evidence that the divorce had not impacted cashflow because he had bought a house.

Comment

As the judges noted: "although there is no legal requirement on the part of a self-employed professional person to reserve for his or her tax liabilities, in our view, a person with such an episodic life would be well advised to take reasonable steps to make some provision for tax liabilities or to ensure that he or she has appropriate bank facilities available to meet his or her expected tax liabilities if he or she subsequently wishes to rely on a reasonable excuse defence.”

Useful guides

Self Assessment late payment and filing penalties

How to appeal a tax penalty

Making Tax Digital: index and timeline

External links

Timothy Raggatt QC v HMRC UKUT 0412

Timothy Raggatt QC v HMRC [2017] TC051445


Do you like our webservice? Join thousands of firms of accountants and Sign Up Now for FREE Nichola's SME tax-updates

tax dog


Do you need Virtual Tax Partner® support?

Paying too much tax? Need assistance in preparing your tax return? Advice on a tax efficient pay package? Create a family investment company?

Any other tax problem? Contact Virtual Tax Partner ® support.