In SC Properties Limited and Richard Cooke v HMRC [2022] TC08537, the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) decided a property was sold by individuals not a partnership. As no partnership existed any CGT and SDLT relief that was claimed on its disposal was denied.

The FTT found that:

The appeal was dismissed.

Comment

This case highlights that implementation is vital when undertaking a tax planning exercise. Failing to ensure that documents are drafted to reflect the intentions of the parties can cause the relief to be missed.

Useful guides on this topic

When does a partnership exist?
When does a partnership exist? Why does it matter? What are the implications for different taxes?

Partnership agreements: What should be considered
Partnership agreements can be invaluable to clarify everyday matters and settle disputes within a partnership. What sort of things should be discussed for inclusion in a partnership agreement? Why are they important?

Buy-to-let: SDLT on partnership incorporation
What are the Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) implications of incorporating my property partnership? Are there any reliefs available? When do the anti-avoidance rules in s.75A-75C Finance Act 2003 apply to partnerships?

How to appeal an HMRC decision
Disagree with an HMRC decision? How to appeal, what type of decision can you appeal and what are your different options when you disagree with HMRC? What are the key steps in making an appeal?

External links

SC Properties Limited and Richard Cooke v HMRC [2022] TC08537


Oak ad
Are you enjoying our content? 

Thousands of accountants and advisers and their clients use www.rossmartin.co.uk as their primary TAX resource.

Register with us now to receive our receive our FREE SME Topical Tax Update & newletter.