In Zipvit Limited v HMRC [2018] EWCA Civ 1515, the Court of Appeal dismissed the taxpayer's appeal and found the supply by Royal Mail, treated erroneously as exempt was the VAT exclusive amount.  

This lead test case was said to be worth £1 billion due to the large number of other cases standing behind it.

One of the main obstacles to the claim was the lack of a VAT invoice:

The other issue in the case was whether VAT had become due or paid by Zipvit, a requirement for the VAT recovery:

Case law led to the judge’s conclusion that if Royal Mail had no contractual right to recover an additional amount equivalent to VAT from Zipvit, the supply would have been treated as VAT inclusive and Zipvit would have been treated as paying the VAT due.

If Royal Mail had a contractual right to recover the VAT but did not enforce it, the judge admitted that referral to the CJEU would be necessary as to whether the amount already paid by Zipvit should be considered a part payment of the supply, which is split between part payment of net and part payment of VAT.

The judge decided not to refer this second point to the CJEU as the appeal already failed due to the lack of a VAT invoice.

The appeal was dismissed.

Links

Reclaims and unjust enrichment

What constitutes a valid VAT invoice?

Time of supply

External link: Zipvit Limited v HMRC [2018] EWCA Civ 1515


 

Wouldn’t it be great and think how much TIME it would SAVE you if someone:

How about if that someone also:

Thousands of firms of accountants and advisers are already using www.rossmartin.co.uk as their primary TAX resource.

At a cost of just £1 per day, it’s a no brainer: FREE up your MIND and your TIME (and your wallet).

And...we run our Virtual Tax Partner support service, if you need assistance with a particular query or technical issue.