In Gary Hymanson v HMRC [2018] TC 6815, the FTT determined that a taxpayer did not lose his fixed protection certificate because he made a mistake in making payments to his pensions.

In 2012, the taxpayer obtained a fixed protection certificate for £1.8 million. A condition of the certificate is that the taxpayer makes no further payments into the funds (Finance Act 2011 Sch 18 para 14(4)).

The issue for the tribunal was then whether the taxpayer could claim equitable relief, citing such cases as Pitt v Holt. HMRC said it could not allow equitable relief, but the judge pointed out that they had already offered some relief. HMRC had said that it would not revoke the certificate if the taxpayer could show that the taxpayer had given directions to stop the standing orders in 2012; that is equitable relief.

The tribunal found that HMRC did not consider whether the standing order payments were void by mistake. Their failure to take that into account made HMRC’s decision unreasonable.

Comment

This case involved simple facts but complex legal arguments on such matters as equitable relief. It does not automatically mean that any taxpayer who overpaid on a fixed protection certificate is protected.

UPDATE: HMRC have withdrawn their appeal in this case.

Links

Pensions planning: Index
Links to our useful guides on this topic.

Pensions: personal contribution v company contribution
What is the most tax efficient way to contribute to your scheme if you are an employee or company owner?

DIY: Small Self Administered Pension schemes
A SSAS can be set up by an employer to provide benefits for members, usually on a defined contribution (money purchase) basis and run by solely by member trustees. You can create and run your own SSAS.

How to appeal a decison of HMRC
Step by step guide, what is appealable, when and how