• SME Tax News
  • Tax Data
  • Explore
  • Virtual Tax Partner ®
  • Login or out
  • Register or Subscribe
  • Autumn Budget 2025
  • Home
  • Starting In Business
  • Self Employed
    • What expenses can I claim?
      • Tax rules for different trades & professions
    • Essential know-how
    • Making Tax Digital
  • Partnerships
  • Incorporation
  • Directors
    • What expenses can I claim?
    • Tax-efficient remuneration
    • Essential know-how
  • Companies
    • Running the business
    • Reorganisations
    • Ceasing trading
    • Essential know-how
    • SEIS & EIS & SITR
    • R & D & Patent Box
    • Creative Industry Zone
  • Employers
    • Employee expenses
    • Employee benefits
    • Essential know-how
    • Real Time Information
  • Disguised Remuneration Zone
  • Capital Allowances
  • Private Client & Estate Planning
    • Capital Gains Tax
    • Inheritance Tax
    • Income, claims & reliefs
    • Trusts & Estates
  • Land & Property
  • Overseas & Residence
  • Devolved Taxes
    • Wales
    • Scotland
    • Northern Ireland
  • Penalties & Compliance
    • Penalties
    • Compliance
    • Appeals
  • Investigations & Enquiries
    • Disclosure opportunities
    • A tax inspector calls...
    • Investigation news
  • More Tax Guides
    • Holiday Fun
    • COVID-19
    • Autumn Budget 2024
    • Spring Budget 2024
    • Autumn Statement 2023
  • Gift Aid
  • VAT
    • VAT News & Cases
    • VAT
    • Making VAT Digital
  • Contact Us
  • About
  • Archived SME News
  1. You are here:  
  2. Home
  3. VAT
  4. VAT News & Cases

VAT Cases & News

Summaries of interesting VAT cases for the SME owner.

Badly worded VAT registration form did not stop assessment

Last Updated: 19 August 2021

In KSM Henryk Zeman SP Z.o.o. v HMRC [2021] UKUT 0182 a Polish company was caught out by a badly worded VAT registration form and HMRC rejected its registration. It should, in fact, have been registered and HMRC later raised a VAT assessment. Did it have a legitimate expectation to expect fairness?

Read more …

PPI claims company commissions were subject to VAT

Last Updated: 18 August 2021

In Claims Advisory Group Limited v HMRC [2021] UKUT 0199, the Upper Tribunal (UT) confirmed that claiming Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) compensation on behalf of individuals was not a VAT exempt supply of insurance services.

Read more …

No evidence of suppression of takings: no best judgement

Last Updated: 11 August 2021

In Brough East Yorkshire Limited v HMRC [2021] TC08213, a Chinese takeaway successfully appealed a £34k VAT assessment. HMRC's one-night invigilation of the food outlet failed to note suppression of cash and the methodology in making the assessments was flawed by poor sampling and failure to adjust for price changes.

Read more …

Suspected fraud does not reverse burden of proof in VAT best judgement

Last Updated: 11 August 2021

In Awards Drinks Limited (in liquidation) v HMRC [2021] EWCA Civ 1235, an appeal against a VAT best judgement failed due to a lack of credible evidence from the company and its director. Although HMRC suspected that the company was involved in tax fraud and money laundering, this did not displace the fact that the burden of proof lay on the company to explain its income.

Read more …

VAT and the sharing economy: Summary of responses

Last Updated: 11 August 2021

HM Treasury has published a summary of responses to their call for evidence ‘VAT and the Sharing Economy’ which opened in December 2020.

Read more …

VAT best judgement assessments upheld by UT

Last Updated: 29 July 2021

In Kingsley Douglas v HMRC UKUT 0163, the Upper Tribunal (UT) dismissed the appeal against ‘best judgement’ VAT assessments upheld by the First Tier Tribunal (FTT). The UT found all the evidence had been properly taken into account by the FTT.

Read more …

VAT group membership cannot be backdated

Last Updated: 29 July 2021

In Dollar Financial UK Ltd v HMRC [2021] TC8199, the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) struck out an appeal regarding the backdating of VAT Group membership. The legislation did not provide for backdating and there was no HMRC decision to appeal so the tribunal did not have jurisdiction.

Read more …

  1. VAT and value shifting: Summary of responses
  2. Failure to notify VAT option to tax not acceptable
  3. Sole director personally liable for VAT penalties
  4. EU Advocate General rules that VAT deductions require a VAT invoice
  5. Receipt of subsidies did not restrict VAT recovery
  6. R & C Brief 10 (2021): Repayment of VAT to overseas businesses not established in the EU and not VAT registered in the UK

Page 26 of 73

  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30

 

🖨️ Print this page

 

Login

 

What's new?

  • Ross Martin Tax: SME Tax Update 11 December 2025
  • Finance (No. 2) Bill 2025-26: Contents
  • Response to electronic invoicing consultation
  • Consultation outcome on taxation of decentralised finance, lending and staking of cryptoassets
  • SME Tax Monthly Summary November 2025
  • Relief for goodwill amortisation disallowed after incorporation
  • Employment-Related Securities Bulletin 62 November 2025
  • Business rates and investment call for evidence
  • Ross Martin Tax: SME Tax Update 4 December 2025
  • Independent Loan Charge review government response
  • Response to 'Reform of behavioural penalties' consultation
  • Non-Discretionary Tax-Advantaged Share Schemes consultation responses
  • Consultation response: R&D tax relief advance clearances
  • Call for evidence: Tax support for entrepreneurs
  • Agent Update 137: November 2025
  • Tax Data Card 2026-27
  • Ross Martin Tax: Autumn Budget Special 27 November 2025
  • Autumn Budget 2025: At a glance
20:20 Expert Led CPD

© 2025 RossMartin.co.uk

Terms & Privacy