In Ventura UK Ltd v HMRC TC06028, the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) considered whether a credit to the director’s loan account in respect of salary had been paid and so should be subject to PAYE.

The tax point for salary is found in s18 of ITEPA 2003, and is the earliest of:

  1. When payment is made on account of earnings.
  2. When the employee becomes entitled to payment of or on account of the earnings.
  3. For directors (whether they were directors at the time):
    1. When the sums are credited in the accounts or records.
    2. If determined by the end of the period to which they relate, the end of that period.
    3. If determined after the end to the period to which they relate, the date they are determined.

At the end of each year (starting 2011/12) the chairman was voted a fee of £16,000 to be paid when the company had sufficient funds to repay loans he had made.

  • Fees were credited to his loan account.
  • HMRC conducted a PAYE investigation and assessed PAYE and NIC, plus penalties, on these amounts.
  • The taxpayer argued that these were not genuine accruals, and that no obligation to pay would arise until the company had the funds to pay.
  • The taxpayer put through a prior year adjustment (PYA) to reverse the accruals as they were “no longer” payable.
  • HMRC contended that the accounts were properly prepared, showing a true and fair view, under the Companies Act 2006 and hence, the PYA was incorrect.

The FTT found that:

  • The chairman was “clearly entitled to receive the annual fees”
  • He “could have called in the loan or otherwise enforced the debt”
  • PAYE was, therefore, due in each of the years in which the annual fee was accrued

It took the view that the PYA did not successfully reverse the charge to tax and NI.

  • The PYA “no longer” implied that the accruals had been payable
  • The chairman could absolve the company of its debt to him, but not its debt to HMRC
  • The FTT refused to comment on whether it was possible to successfully reverse the accrual

Comment

The FTT noted that to avoid the tax and NI, the chairman would need to have stated “that he did not consider the annual fee payable to him  in advance of each trading year end, before the vote for accruals in his favour”,

Links

Ventura UK Ltd v HMRC [2017]UKFTT 0585 (TC)

Director’s loan account

Real time information


 

Wouldn’t it be great and think how much TIME it would SAVE you if someone:

  • READ all the latest tax news, case decisions, new legislation and articles in tax and then summarised them for you?
  • Only alerted you to things that are RELEVANT to you?

How about if that someone also:

  • Updated those summaries in REAL TIME for you
  • ADDED examples, planning points, toolkits and calculators, and
  • Linked all that information together and also provided you with CPD?

Thousands of firms of accountants and advisers are already using www.rossmartin.co.uk as their primary TAX resource.

At a cost of just £1 per day, it’s a no brainer: FREE up your MIND and your TIME (and your wallet).

And...we run our Virtual Tax Partner support service, if you need assistance with a particular query or technical issue.

Comments (1)

Rated 5 out of 5 based on 1 voters
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

What if salary is given up by the employee to help the company with cashflow, however the company still keeps a record of the amount given up which it may or may not pay in the future.

Would this still attract PAYE and NIC?

Guest
  1. 5 / 5
There are no comments posted here yet

Leave your comments

  1. Posting comment as a guest.
Rate this post:
Attachments (0 / 3)
Share Your Location