In Noaref & Mozhdeh v HMRC [2020] TC7873, the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) dismissed a claim for the Replacement Dwelling Exemption which would have granted a refund of the higher rate of Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) on the purchase of a property replacing their old main residence.

Higher rates of SDLT are due on the purchase of residential property where certain conditions are met. Of these, Condition D is met only if the purchased property is not a replacement for the buyer’s only or main residence. 

The appellants, purchased two properties with the intention of combining them to form a single residence to replace their existing main residence which they later sold.

  • The appellants purchased Number 31 on 24 May 2017 and paid the higher rate of SDLT.
  • The appellants purchased Number 38, a property adjoining Number 31, on 6 June 2017 and paid the higher rate of SDLT.
  • The appellants sold their old main residence on 5 June 2018.
  • On 30 July 2018 they submitted amendments to the SDLT returns for Numbers 31 and 38 claiming a repayment on the basis that the purchased properties were to be amalgamated to form a single dwelling which would become their main residence.
  • HMRC opened enquiries into both returns.
  • HMRC allowed a claim for the relief on Number 31 but rejected it for Number 38.
  • The appellants appealed to the FTT.

The FTT found that:

  • The appellants and their children were living together in the two properties, using access via an outdoor balcony and had obtained planning permission to combine them.
  • The appellants did not view either Number 31 or 38 on their own as a suitable residence for the family.
  • Condition D was with reference to the purchase of a single dwelling, so it required the appellants to intend to use each purchased dwelling as their only or main residence.
  • Neither Number 31 nor Number 38 were intended to be the appellants’ only or main residence. It was the combined property which was to be that residence.
  • While both properties were occupied as a residence, neither should be treated individually as their only or main residence.
  • Condition D was met and no higher rate SDLT relief was due on either property.
  • HMRC had wrongly allowed Replacement Dwelling Exemption on Number 31 but were out of time to amend the assessment.

The appeal was dismissed.

Useful guides on this topic

SDLT: At a glance, Stamp Duty Land Tax, rates and allowances
What is Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT)? What is the rates of Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT)?

SDLT: Residential property higher rates
What Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) rate applies for the purchase of a second home? What is the SDLT higher rate? Are there any reliefs from the SDLT higher rate?

External links

Noaref & Mozhdeh v HMRC [2020] TC7873

 


Squirrel ad

 

Are you enjoying our content?

Thousands of accountants and advisers and their clients use www.rossmartin.co.uk as their primary TAX resource.

Register with us now to receive our unique FREE Tax Planning Tips and Advice Guide & our FREE OMB Newsletter.

 

 

Comments (0)

Rated 0 out of 5 based on 0 voters
There are no comments posted here yet

Leave your comments

  1. Posting comment as a guest.
Rate this post:
Attachments (0 / 3)
Share Your Location

 

Enjoying our content? 

Sign up now to receive our unique FREE Tax Planning Tips and Advice Guide & our FREE Newsletter.

.Squirrel ad