In Strictly Money Ltd v HMRC [2024] TC09296, SME R&D relief for subcontractor expenditure was denied because the expenditure was not wholly and exclusively incurred for the company’s trade. 

Rocket science

  • Strictly Money Ltd, a company with a technology-based entrepreneurial business, claimed an additional deduction under SME R&D relief, for expenditure on Contracted-out R&D.
  • Due to significant losses, the company also claimed an R&D tax credit at 14.5% of the surrenderable loss.
  • HMRC issued an assessment disallowing both the additional deduction and the SME R&D tax credit, stating that:
    • The company was not carrying on a Trade during the relevant period.
    • The subcontractor expenditure did not qualify as an allowable deduction in calculating the company's trading profits.
    • The subcontractor expenditure was not attributable to R&D carried out on behalf of the company.
  • The company Appealed to the First Tier Tribunal (FTT). 

The FTT found that:

  • The company's main business activity did not constitute carrying on a trade.
    • The business was at a very early stage, focused on getting a technology-based entrepreneurial idea off the ground and was far from commercial viability.
  • The company’s consulting work, although a 'sideline' to its main activity, did qualify as trading.
  • No relief was available for the subcontractor expenditure because the subcontractor had not performed any 'meaningful' work for the company during the relevant period.
    • Expenses must be wholly and exclusively for a trade (per s.54), and this expenditure, when viewed realistically, did not serve any business purpose.
  • The remaining expenditure, although incurred for the company's main business activity, did not relate to the sideline consulting work (which was considered trading). As a result, it was not allowable as a deduction from the company's trading profits.

The FTT dismissed the appeal. 

Editor's Note 

For accounting periods beginning on or after 1 April 2024, significant changes have been introduced to the rules for claiming relief on contracted-out R&D. Under the new definition of 'contracted out', the entity entitled to claim relief is the one responsible for making the key decisions about the R&D. See R&D: Contracting out R&D & Externally Provided Workers (EPW)

Useful guides on this topic 

R&D: Contracting out R&D & Externally Provided Workers (EPW)
What is contracting out R&D? When does contracted-out R&D qualify for relief? Who can claim the relief? When do externally provided worker costs qualify for relief? What are the special rules applying to Northern Ireland companies? 

R&D: SME Tax Credit scheme
What Research & Development (R&D) schemes are available for small and medium-sized companies undertaking R&D? How to make an R&D claim? What are the qualifying costs and how much can be claimed?

Research & Development Tax Reliefs: At a glance
What is Research and Development (R&D) relief? What is the Merged RDEC scheme? What is the SME credit scheme? What is the Enhanced R&D Intensive Support (ERIS) scheme? Which R&D Relief can you claim? What are the rates of relief?

Is it a trade, a business, or an investment activity?
Starting in business or running one? Is your new or existing business a trade, a business or an investment activity? The distinction is very important for tax purposes. This guide runs through key issues for tax purposes.

R&D Zone: Do I have a valid R&D Claim?
Do I have a valid R&D Claim? What conditions do I need to meet? What form of relief can I claim?

R & D & Patent Box
Find out all about Research & Development and Patent Box tax reliefs.

External Links 

Strictly Money Ltd v HMRC [2024] TC09296

Squirrel advert

Loving our content? 😍
Sign up Now!
For free tax news, cases,
discounts & special tax briefings

We hope you are enjoying this amazing Practical Tax Database here at www.rossmartin.co.uk.

 

.