In Charles John Caton v HMRC [2019] TC07343, the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) found that a café run by Mr Caton was separate from a restaurant run by his wife.

  • Mr Caton ran a cafe run a cafe for a number of years. His wife opened a restaurant in the adjoining premises a couple of years later.
  • There were different opening hours, leases and tax returns. There were also separate pools of tips and separate tills. Mr Caton did not know the names of the restaurant staff. The operations did not share common areas except a bathroom. The pool of customers was different and customers clearly distinguished between the two businesses.
  • The majority of the supplies were from the same wholesalers. Mr Caton often called himself the owner of the business to visitors including on a HMRC questionnaire. The two businesses shared the same website. Mrs Caton occasionally helped out in the cafe. The leases, insurances and alcohol licences were all in Mr Caton’s name. The kitchen premises were partly shared.

HMRC viewed these as an artificial separation of businesses to avoid exceeding the VAT registration threshold and HMRC looked to combine the businesses.

Mr Caton and wife appealed for the businesses to be treated separately.

The FTT concluded that businesses were separate. The extent of Mrs Caton’s involvement and the partly sharing of the kitchen was minimal.

The appeal was therefore allowed and the associated penalties were quashed.

Comment

To avoid the risk of being seen as artificially separating businesses, it is important that the businesses are sufficiently at arm’s length from each other and only have normal commercial relationships with each other.

Useful guides for our subscribers

Registering for VAT

Business splitting and VAT (single business directions)

External link

Charles John Carton v HMRC [20198] TC07343

Comments (1)

Rated 0 out of 5 based on 0 voters
This comment was minimized by the moderator on the site

Was it a business split or HMRC trying to amalgamate two separate business concerns. The businesses were formed at different times with some joint costs but separate owners, the fact that they were husband and wife these days should not matter...

Was it a business split or HMRC trying to amalgamate two separate business concerns. The businesses were formed at different times with some joint costs but separate owners, the fact that they were husband and wife these days should not matter too much given the divorce rate. Care is needed to avoid problems as per your comment as HMRC do endeavour to draw businesses into the VAT net.

Read More
Guest
There are no comments posted here yet

Leave your comments

  1. Posting comment as a guest.
Rate this post:
Attachments (0 / 3)
Share Your Location