HMRC have published a consultation ‘Scope of VAT Grouping’: it reviews aspects of the UK’s VAT grouping arrangements following decisions of the European Court.
SME Tax News
HMRC have published a consultation ‘Tax-advantaged venture capital schemes – streamlining the advance assurance service’.
This relates to the advance assurance service provided for the Enterprise Investment Scheme (EIS), the Seed Enterprise Investment Scheme (SEIS), Venture Capital Trusts (VCTs) and Social Investment Tax Relief (SITR).
Demand for advance assurance has trebled since 2011/12. Response times are already lengthening and HMRC warn that any further increases in demand will have an impact on standards of service.
HMRC were asking for comments as to how the service can be made more efficient, and how cases with the greatest uncertainty could be prioritised.
The consultation document had five options:
- Do nothing.
- Withdraw the advance assurance service.
- Restrict access to the service, e.g.
- To companies seeking their first investment,
- By reference to the size of the investment or company,
- To companies seeking SEIS investment only.
- Provide a service for discrete aspects of the rules or a company’s eligibility under a specific rule.
- Using standard documents such as shareholder agreements for pre-approval.
The consultation closed on 1 February 2017.
Links
EIS: Enterprise Investment Scheme (freeview)
EIS or SEIS: advanced assurance from HMRC
SEIS: Seed Enterprise Investment Scheme
External link
HMRC consultation: Tax-advantaged venture capital schemes - streamlining the advance assurance service
Consultation questions
Question 1. In what context are you responding to this consultation; e.g. investor, investee company, fund manager, industry body representative.
Question 2. Which tax-advantaged scheme or schemes have you used?
Question 3. What would be the impact of increasing response times, including any increase in costs and / or administrative burdens?
Question 4. What would be the impact of withdrawing the advance assurance service?
Question 5. How could the advance assurance service be changed to focus on cases where there is greatest uncertainty? What would be the impact of such changes?
Question 6. In what way could the advance assurance service be limited to discrete aspects of the rules? Please provide details of the impact on your business, particularly any increase in costs and / or administrative burdens.
Question 7. How would a standard set of approved documents assist you? Would you be prepared to cooperate in devising a standard set of documents? Please provide details of any savings in costs and / or administrative burdens from using standard documents.
Question 8. Do you have any other suggestions to improve our advance assurance service?
In Chartridge Developments Ltd v HMRC [2016] TC05493 the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) cancelled penalties for late submission of ATED Returns. HMRC's penalty notices were defective.
In Heating Plumbing Supplies Ltd v HMRC [2016] TC05480 the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) allowed input VAT recovery on a management buyout.
Warning! MAP Registrations: they pretend to be Google. Avoid this scam at all cost. Don't do their free trial. Please pass this on to any business you know. We are being hounded.
In Kuldeep Delay v HMRC [2016] TC05501 taxpayer’s appeal against a penalty for late payment of tax was struck out: he failed to appeal on any of the grounds as set by the relevant legislation.
The CIOT and ATT have issued new Continuing Professional Development (CPD) regulations that will apply from 1 January 2017. These shift the focus from the time spent on CPD to its outcome.
In JP Whitter (Waterwell Engineers) Limited v HMRC [2016] EWCA Civ 1160 the Court of Appeal held that HMRC did not have to take into account the adverse impact on a taxpayer’s business when cancelling a CIS gross payment registration.
We have tax job vacancies. We are looking for people who are strong in private client and SME/owner-managed business tax. Based working at home, part or full-time.