In P Kaur v HMRC [2016] TC06210, the First-Tier Tribunal upheld HMRC’s penalties, finding that Ms Kaur was subject to VAT on her eBay business and had failed to notify HMRC of her obligation to be registered.
VAT Cases & News
Summaries of interesting VAT cases for the SME owner.
In S D Raithatha (As Liquidators of Halal Monitoring Committee Limited) v M N A Baig & Ors [2017] EWCH 2059 (Ch), the High Court found the Directors were personally liable for VAT debts due to a failure to register for, and charge, VAT.
In St Brendan’s Sixth Form College v HMRC [2018] TC06384, the First-Tier Tribunal (FTT) agreed with the taxpayer that a new block at the college was independent of the existing buildings and the construction costs were zero-rated.
In Hastings Insurance Service Limited v HMRC [2018] TC06306, the First-Tier Tribunal (FTT) concluded the Gibraltarian company to which brokering services were provided did not have a UK fixed establishment, the supply was not exempt, and VAT was recoverable.
In Will Woodland v HMRC [2017] TC06021, the First-Tier Tribunal (FTT) agreed with the partial exemption method used by the charity: based on the way in which the land was used, an area basis.
In HMRC v Greenisland Football Club [2018] UKUT 0440, the upper tribunal (UT) overturned the First Tier Tribunal (FTT)'s decision to allow a club to zero-rate construction of a clubhouse. It agreed that no penalties were due.
In Clark Hill Limited v HMRC [2018] UKFTT TC06368, the First-Tier Tribunal (FTT) found that three of four properties sold did not meet the conditions for TOGC as the options to tax were not in place before the deposit was paid.
- Supercar experience damage waiver is not insurance
- Repayment supplement: HMRC's enquiries 'reasonable'
- Alternative methods of collecting VAT: a consultation
- VAT registration threshold: call for evidence
- Post-sale planning permission not enough for zero-rating
- DIY VAT reclaim cannot be blocked due to post-construction events