VAT Cases & News

In Fulfillment Logistics UK Limited v HMRC [2023] TC08736, the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) found that the Kittel principle did apply to deny input VAT repayment but the customer also had a fixed place of business in the UK for supply purposes, meaning output VAT was due.

In Paradise Wildlife Park Limited v HMRC [2023] TC08729, the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) rejected the appellant's claim that the costs incurred in the building of its walk-through dinosaur exhibit and lion enclosure were zero-rated for VAT as the exhibit was not a building and not intended solely for use for a charitable purpose.

In News Corp UK & Ireland v HMRC [2023] UKSC7, the Supreme Court (SC) found electronic versions of newspapers were standard rated for VAT purposes prior to 1 May 2020.

In Gray & Farrar International LLP v HMRC [2023] EWCA Civ 121, the Court of Appeal (CoA) found that a dating matchmaking service was not a supply of consultancy for VAT purposes. This meant the services were within the scope of UK VAT when supplied to clients outside of the UK and EU.

In Greenspace (UK) Ltd v HMRC [2023] EWCA Civ 106, the Court of Appeal (CoA) found that insulated conservatory roof panels were not insulation for the purposes of VAT-reduced rating. 

In Daniel Dunne v HMRC [2023] TC8716, the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) denied a DIY housebuilder a VAT reclaim. The building created was considered an extension by the underlying planning application and not a separate dwelling.